Home | Search Abstracts | Steering Group | Links | Feedback | Pharmacy Practice Research Trust

INTER AND INTRA PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES OF NON-MEDICAL PRESCRIBING IN HOSPITALS

Buckley P (1), Blenkinsopp A (2), Grime J (2) 
1 Pharmacy Department, Dudley Group NHS Trust
2 Department of Medicines Management Keele University paul.buckley@mcht.nhs.uk

Background 
There have been numerous publications discussing the introduction of non-medical prescribing as part of the government’s wider plan to modernise the NHS1, 2. However, there has been little research published to date on the factors that might enable or inhibit the implementation of supplementary prescribing. The research reported here forms part of a wider study of non-medical supplementary prescribing in the hospital setting. 

Aim 
The aim of the study was to obtain the views of key stakeholders about non-medical supplementary prescribing in one NHS Trust.

Method 
Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted using a pre-piloted interview schedule and involved a purposive sample of Trust stakeholders including 3 pharmacists, 4 doctors and 3 nurses of different levels of experience and background, a patient, the Trust Clinical Governance Officer and 3 Trust managers. The interview explored respondents’ understanding of non-medical prescribing, possible benefits and potential applications to the Trust, how participants felt that nurses, pharmacists, doctors and patients would respond to non-medical prescribing and issues relating to resource implications, training requirements and the organisation e.g. litigation. 

Findings 
All of the stakeholders thought that the principle of non-medical prescribing was positive and were supportive of its introduction within the Trust. However, stakeholders expressed some concerns relating to health care professionals’ prescribing. Medical staff had reservations about non-medical prescribing and felt it should operate within tightly controlled protocols
. Nurses were perceived by both doctors and pharmacists as having close patient contact but insufficient pharmacological knowledge to prescribe medicines. Nurse respondents felt that some nurses would want to prescribe whilst others would prefer to undertake more traditional nursing roles. It was suggested that this could create friction within nursing ranks. Pharmacists were seen by doctors and nurses as being experts in drug therapy but lacking diagnostic skills and knowledge of patients to prescribe. Pharmacist respondents were less positive about pharmacists prescribing than other stakeholders interviewed who felt that pharmacists would be very keen to prescribe. Reasons identified for pharmacist reticence included accountability and the need for financial remuneration. 

Conclusion 
There was considerable support for non-medical prescribing within the Trust. However, the study has identified that inter and intra professional relationships will be a key factor in the implementation of non-medical prescribing in hospitals. 

References

  1. Secretaries of State for Health, Scotland & Wales Primary Care: Delivering the Future Department of Health London Stationery Office 1996 CM 3512

  2. NHS Executive. Primary Care: the Future. Leeds Department of Health 1996


Presented at the HSRPP Conference 2005, Reading