|
HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS: A META-ANALYSIS
OF PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
Kongkaew C, Ashcroft DM, Noyce PR
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Manchester,
Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL (chuenjid.kongkaew@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk)
Background
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important risk to patient safety
in a range of health care settings, including the interface between primary
and secondary care. Although, the previous systematic reviews have examined
the prevalence of ADRs causing hospital admissions, limited attention
has been paid to the influence of different ADR definitions, detection
methods, and population groups on the reported prevalence rates.[1]
Objective
To determine the prevalence of hospital admissions associated with adverse
drug reactions (ADRs) and examine how the prevalence varies between different
population groups and the method of ADR detection.
Method
Studies were identified through electronic searches (CINAHL, EMBASE,
and MEDLINE) from their respective inception dates of the databases to
November 2005. This was supplemented by searching the reference lists
of all retrieved studies and review articles. Studies were included if
they were prospective observational studies, and used the World Health
Organization (WHO) ADR definition.[2] There were no language restrictions.
Two authors reviewed the studies independently. A random-effect meta-analysis
was used to determine the overall pooled prevalence across the studies
with 95% CIs. Sensitivity analysis examined the influence of patient age
groups and the methods of ADR detection on the prevalence rates. All statistics
were performed using the RevMan version 4.2 statistical software package.
Results
In all, 24 studies were identified, including covering 66 961 patients
admitted to hospital. Of these, 2 080 admissions were associated with
ADRs. The overall pooled prevalence rate across the 24 studies was 5%
(95% CIs, 4% to 6%). The prevalence of ADR admissions in children, adults,
and elderly populations were 5% (95% CI 4% to 6%), 6% (95% CI 5% to 8%),
and 11% (95% CI 8% to 13%), respectively. ADR rates also varied depending
on the methods of ADR detection employed in the different studies. By
stratifying the method of ADR detection, the prevalence of ADR admissions
determined by the combination methods of medical record review and spontaneous
reporting or medical record review and interview were generally higher
than that detected by medical record review alone. Cardiovascular drugs
were most often the cause of ADRs in adults and the elderly, whilst respiratory
drugs were most often associated with ADRs in children.
Conclusions
Approximately 5% of all hospital admissions are associated with ADRs.
Higher rates were found in specific age group, particularly elderly patients
who are likely to be receiving multiple medications to manage long term
illness. Likewise, the ADR definition and method of detection can also
explain much of the variation in the reported rates between different
studies. The findings from this study can be used to target initiatives
designed to improve patient safety at the interface between primary and
secondary care.
References
(1) Beijer HJM, De Blaey CJ. Hospitalisations caused by adverse drug
reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharm World
Sci 2002;24(2):46-54.
(2) World Health Organization. International drug monitoring: the role
of national centres. 1972. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO technical
report series No. 498.
Presented at the HSRPP Conference 2006, Bath
|