|
FAMILY-BUILDING AND THE FUTURE PHARMACY WORKFORCE
Willis SC, Hassell K, Shann P, Noyce P, Cantrill J.
Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies @ The Workforce Academy, The University
of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.(sarah.willis@manchester.ac.uk)
Introduction
A unique longitudinal study following the careers of pharmacy students
is currently underway. The study overall seeks to understand more about
employment patterns, early career choices, and levels of job satisfaction
of the cohort of students graduating in 2006. These students are the future
pharmacy workforce, and this paper reports findings which relate specifically
to family-building and anticipated future work patterns of these students.
Method
A survey of the cohort of pharmacy students studying at 14 GB schools
of pharmacy was undertaken in the spring of 2005. This was the first survey
in a series and had an explicit focus on choices made as undergraduates.
Results
The response rate was 67% (71.5% of respondents were female, 28.5%
male). When asked about their general patterns of work over the course
of their career, only 15% of all students anticipated they would work
full-time until retirement. Comparison between male and female students'
expected work patterns demonstrated some striking differences: looking
at the highest frequencies for this variable for male respondents, 33%
expected to work full-time until retirement, with 26% expecting to work
full-time but aiming to retire early; for female students, the highest
frequencies were: to work full-time but with breaks for maternity leave
(31%); work full-time early on and then part-time later on (20%); and
work predominantly full-time with periods of part-time work (19%). The
variable also had a significant relationship with collapsed ethnic group
(white/non-white): non-whites were more likely to expect to work full-time
until retirement and less likely to expect to have career breaks. To help
quantify the specific impact of family-building a question asking about
expected career breaks for different reasons was put to the students -
62% and 10% of female and male students respectively expected to have
a career break to start a family.
We found no significant gender differences in terms of respondents' expectations
to work hard in their career, ambitions for their career, or whether they
saw pharmacy as a career until retirement. But, significantly, female
students were more likely than the male students to believe that career
prospects in pharmacy are becoming more attractive (86% and 70% respectively),
and more likely to think that there are lots of career opportunities in
pharmacy (89% and 82% respectively).
Discussion
The profession itself often explains female entry into pharmacy in terms
of how the profession allows its practitioners to pursue a career in addition
to family-building.1 The potential impact of the growing female presence
in pharmacy has previously been raised;2,3 the findings reported here
provide strong evidence for the first time that family-building is likely
to have a significant impact on the hours female students will work when
they qualify as pharmacists. Perhaps employers need to consider how they
will accommodate this particular set of expectations, or whether they
should begin to try to change them.
References
1. Dragaulis J, McGan WF. Commitment to the profession of pharmacy: are
there sex differences? American Pharmacy 1989;29:28-34.
2. Elworthy P. Work pattern of women pharmacists graduating in 1953. Pharmaceutical
Journal 1988;January 2:11-6.
3. Hassell K. The impact of social change on professions - gender and
pharmacy in the UK: an agenda for action. The International Journal of
Pharmacy Practice 2000;8:1-9.
Presented at the HSRPP Conference 2006, Bath
|