HSRPP Health Services Research and Pharmacy Practice
HSRPP Conference Cork 2012
Abstract Judging Criteria
Marking grid for Abstracts (qualitative / quantitative only) - (pdf)
|
Score |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Are the aims clearly stated? |
Aims not stated |
Aims presented but not entirely clear |
Aims clearly presented |
|
Is the design appropriate? |
Design does not appear to be appropriate |
Design seems appropriate although other methods may have been better |
Design seems entirely appropriate to the research question |
|
Is the method clearly described? |
Method not described |
Method described to a limited extent but all aspects of method not entirely clear |
Method clearly and unequivocally described |
|
Have the findings (both positive and negative) been described clearly? |
No findings are mentioned |
Findings mentioned but unclear or not well discussed |
Findings clearly identified and well described. |
|
Are the findings discussed fully with implications for practice research and/ or policy? |
Implications of the research findings are not discussed |
Implications not clear or not well discussed |
Clear implications for practice, research or policy discussed |
|
|
Good reason for outright rejection |
|
|
Possible reason for rejection |
|
|
Good reason for acceptance |
Disclaimer – Final decision is based on the abstract as a whole. The HSRPP will not enter into discussion on their final decisions.